Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

David Martinez, A/K/A v. State of California

October 15, 2012

DAVID MARTINEZ, A/K/A ROBERT VASQUEZ, PLAINTIFF,
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STEPHEN DREW, STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT : OF CORRECTIONS, DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: William K. Sessions III District Court Judge

ORDER

The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed August 14, 2012. Plaintiff's objections were filed on September 14, 2012, October, 1, 5, 9, and 10, 2012.

A district judge must make a de novo determination of those portions of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation to which an objection is made. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1); Perez-Rubio v. Wyckoff, 718 F.Supp. 217, 227 (S.D.N.Y. 1989). The district judge may "accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the magistrate's proposed findings and recommendations." Id. After careful review of the file, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the objections, this Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's recommendations in full for the reasons stated in the Report.

It is hereby ORDERED that this case be TRANSFERRRED pursuant to 28 U.S.C., §1406 to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.

William K. Sessions III

20121015

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.